\begin{table}[htpb]\begin{center} \caption{Influence of the MIL on DIL's Mobility, if FIL is co-resident, OLS regressions}\label{table:app-table3}\begin{tabular}{lcccccc} \toprule
 &  \multicolumn{6}{c}{\textbf{Outcome: \# close outside peers in village}}  \\ \midrule &   \shortstack{Marital\\duration $\leq$ 5} & \shortstack{Marital\\duration $>$ 5} & \shortstack{Husband\\disapproves of FP} & \shortstack{Husband\\approves of FP}  & \shortstack{Husband\\migrant} & \shortstack{Husband\\not migrant} \\  &  (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6)  \\ \midrule
Lives with MIL           &      -0.187** &      -0.108** &      -0.202   &      -0.131***&      -0.221***&      -0.082   \\
                         &     [0.071]   &     [0.047]   &     [0.172]   &     [0.036]   &     [0.061]   &     [0.048]   \\
\midrule N               &         240   &         431   &          70   &         601   &         341   &         329   \\
Control mean (new)       &       0.365   &       0.360   &       0.375   &       0.359   &       0.384   &       0.342   \\
Control mean (original)  &       0.196   &       0.297   &       0.257   &       0.261   &       0.238   &       0.286   \\
\bottomrule \\[-5ex] \end{tabular} \end{center} \begin{tablenotes} This table reports coefficients from specification (1). Each column is a separate regression. The outcome variables are the same as those in Tables 2 and 3. The sample is restricted to households where the father-in-law (FIL) is co-resident. In all cases, we control for the DIL's age, years of schooling, Hindu dummy, amount of land owned by the household, and fixed effects for her caste category (SC-ST, OBC, or Other caste) and village. Control mean refers to the dependent variable mean for women who have a co-resident FIL but who do not live with their MIL. Robust standard errors in brackets are clustered by village. \sym{*}\(p<0.1\),\sym{**}\(p<0.05\),\sym{***}\(p<0.01\). \end{tablenotes} \end{table}
